Affiliate Disclosure
Editorial Independence and Revenue Disclosure

We maintain affiliate arrangements with multiple licensed casino operators that distribute Aviamasters. The commercial structures in use across these arrangements include:

• Revenue share: an ongoing percentage of the net gaming revenue attributable to players we have referred to the operator, continuing as long as those players remain active on the platform.
• CPA (cost per acquisition): a fixed payment that is triggered when a referred player fulfills a specified qualifying deposit condition.
• Hybrid models that combine a CPA component with an ongoing revenue share component.

The specific commercial figures within each arrangement are confidential and are not published here. What we state directly is that the financial terms of any arrangement, whether favorable or otherwise, have not influenced and will not influence which casinos appear in our Aviamasters coverage or what editorial assessment we publish about them.

A claim of that kind is easy to make, so the demonstration sits in the criteria themselves. Casino evaluation is not a weighted assessment in which commercial terms can compensate for editorial shortcomings; it is a series of binary criteria, each of which must be satisfied before an operator is listed at all.

Periodic re-evaluation supplies the second check. Listed operators are not listed permanently, and when a material change at a listed operator affects one of our evaluation criteria, our coverage is updated to reflect that change independently of any commercial relationship we have with that operator at the time.

The central question any reader should ask is whether commercial arrangements between us and casino operators shape the editorial assessments we publish about those operators. The answer is that they do not. Every casino considered for Aviamasters coverage is assessed against the same fixed set of criteria, applied uniformly regardless of the commission arrangement in place:

• A current, publicly verifiable gambling license from a regulatory authority with genuine standing.
• Terms for bonuses, withdrawals and betting stakes that are written in language readers can genuinely understand and evaluate before committing to anything.
• A correctly implemented Aviamasters integration: the counter mechanic functioning as BGaming’s documentation specifies; all three token types operating correctly; automatic round resolution confirmed, with no cashout button presented, which would be incorrect since this feature does not exist in the game format.
• Transparency about the RTP configuration the casino is running for Aviamasters.
• A working, accessible demo mode that provides an accurate preview of the real-money game.
• Mobile platform performance confirmed through direct testing rather than reliance on operator assurances.
• Responsible gambling tools – deposit limits, loss limits, session time limits, cooling-off periods and self-exclusion – accessible from within a player’s standard account settings without requiring them to contact customer support as a prerequisite.

An operator that fails to satisfy any one of these criteria is not listed in our Aviamasters coverage, regardless of what it offers commercially. Nor are listed operators listed permanently: licenses are suspended or allowed to lapse, casino terms are revised in ways that affect reader experience, responsible gambling tool accessibility deteriorates, and Aviamasters implementation quality shifts. We therefore re-evaluate on a rolling basis, and when a material change at a listed operator affects one of the criteria above, coverage is updated independently of any commercial relationship in place at the time.

Ongoing Monitoring and Re-Evaluation

The active monitoring of listed casinos is part of how we operate rather than a periodic exercise. We track license status changes, watch for material changes to casino terms and conditions, and take seriously any discrepancy reported by a reader between what we have published about a casino and what that reader has experienced. Reader-reported discrepancies are among the most actionable triggers for an immediate re-evaluation of a listed operator’s status, and the contact form is the mechanism for submitting any such report.

Nothing published on this Site constitutes a guarantee of any specific outcome in any Aviamasters session. The approximately 97% RTP is a statistical average computed across a very large number of rounds; it does not predict what any individual session or any finite sequence of rounds will produce. The 250x maximum win is an absolute ceiling on a single round’s payout, not a description of typical outcomes. BGaming retains the ability to modify any game parameter at any time; our descriptions reflect current published documentation but cannot guarantee that every casino is running precisely those parameters at the moment any reader views this content. Always verify current terms directly with any casino before depositing.

The low-volatility classification of Aviamasters has a specific practical implication that is worth stating here: it does not mean the game is low-risk. It means that individual wins and losses are smaller and more frequent than in high-volatility formats. The aggregate exposure in any session is a function of stake level and round count, not of volatility classification. Low volatility produces a session experience that feels steady and controlled, which can cause the cumulative direction of balance movement to be less visible in real time. The account balance figure, checked periodically during a session, is the reliable measure of what the session is actually producing.

We operate no casino and have no access to player accounts, session records or round histories at any operator. We cannot investigate gameplay disputes, examine specific round outcomes, or mediate between a player and any casino. If something goes wrong at a casino you reached through this Site, the casino’s own support channel is the appropriate first contact, and the casino’s licensing regulator is the appropriate escalation route if the casino fails to resolve the matter. Nothing in our commercial arrangements with any casino operator modifies or restricts any consumer protection right you hold under the law of your jurisdiction.

The criteria we apply to casino listings are partly intended to reduce the likelihood that readers encounter situations requiring that escalation. By listing only operators with current verifiable licenses, readable terms, functioning Aviamasters integrations and accessible responsible gambling tools, we aim to reduce the probability that readers need to invoke formal dispute resolution.

Promotional Bonuses and Affiliate Commission

There is no correlation between the scale or generosity of a casino’s promotional offers and the commission it pays us as an affiliate. These are independent commercial decisions. Bonus generosity does not factor into our evaluation criteria, does not influence our affiliate commission terms, and does not affect the objectivity of our editorial assessment.

We update this disclosure page when commercial arrangements change in material ways, or when applicable regulatory expectations evolve. The version of this disclosure published here at any given time is the operative version.

For reference, what a correctly implemented Aviamasters integration means in our evaluation: the counter mechanic behaves as BGaming’s documentation specifies, with flat addition tokens, multiplier tokens and rockets each acting as described; the round resolves automatically with no cashout option offered at any point; and the demo mode accurately previews the real-money game. Those are the elements we test, and re-test, at every listed operator.